Vitamin A in Pregnancy
« Back to supplements list
The measurement of Vitamin A has recently been changed from the
old ‘iu’(international units), with which we were all familiar, to the new ‘European
Correctness’ of ‘mcg’ or micro-grams.
These two measures do not reflect exactly the same thing.
The international units used to give the potency of the source (which can vary with
the oil soluble vitamins). The mcg only gives the weight. However, the powers-that-be
have ruled that to convert iu of Vitamin A to mcg, we divide by 3.33, and so for all
practical purposes this will now have to serve us.
To avoid confusion we will give both measurements in this
leaflet, as you may find either in papers, or on tubs of supplements.
For pregnancy, Foresight advises 2,500iu (833mcg) – 5,000iu (1,501mcg)
Vitamin A excess can be dangerous in pregnancy, but so can
Vitamin A deficiency. The dangers of Vitamin A deficiency have been too little
understood or published over the last decade.
Scientific advice on what constitutes excess Vitamin A is
very variable. The Denner Report quoted 10,000iu (3,3003mcg). Professor Merlyn Werbach
of the University of California (arguably the world authority on fetal nutrition) says
40,000iu (12,012mcg). An Australian source gives 25,000(7,507mcg).
Foresight programmes are always very conservative, as the
obvious approach is to give enough to avoid any danger of deficiency, while giving
very little more than this, to be sure of staying within the safe limit.
The maximum we usually give is:
- 2 x Foresight Vitamin Supplements = 2500 iu (750 mcg)
- 4 x Selenium ACE = 1732 iu (520 mcg)
- Total Given = 4232 iu (1270 mcg)
The minimum we give is the 2500iu (750mcg) present in two Foresight Vitamins.
Even our most generous programmes give less than half the most conservative upper
limit, which was the Denner Report’s 100,000iu (3,303mcg).
It is interesting to note in this context that during the war (when despite rationing,
most people’s diet was more nutritious than that of today), the Government decreed all pregnant women should have
“a teaspoonful of cod liver oil” daily. It is hard to assess the amount of Vitamin A, as a lot would have depended
on the size of the teaspoon, but it is likely to have been in the region of 5,000iu (1,501mcg). At the present
time in the USA, pregnant women are given 5,000iu (1,501mcgVitamin daily. In some areas of Australia, they are
given 10,000iu (3,303mcg). UNESCO campaigns for funding to give Vitamin A to pregnant mothers in the Third World
to stop babies from being born blind.
Vitamin A deficiency deformities in experimental animals have been recorded by Dr.
Isobel Jennings of Cambridge, and by Dr. Weston Price of California.
Isobel Jennings, MRCVS, Cambridge
Fetal animal studies by a veterinary pathologist.
Vitamin A
Excess
- Cranial abnormalities
- Cleft Palate
- Hare Lip
- Eye defects
- Hydrocephalus
- Spina Bifida
- Exencephalus
Deficiency
- No eyes
- Micropthalmias
- Blindness
- Cardiovascular Anomalies
- Urogenital Anomalies
- Diaphragmatic Hernia
- Hydrospadias
- Cryptorchidism
Dr Weston Price of California, lists Vitamin A deficiency as causing problems with the
development of the eyes, ranging from impaired sight, to blindness, to being born with no eyes (anopthalmia).
Dr Price also reported damage to the nerves leading to the ears, and therefore impaired hearing, ranging to total
deafness. Prolongation of the gestation period and long and difficult labour were reported in rats. Calves were
reported as being born small and less likely to survive. Farm animals generally were reported to have had less
successful reproduction and lactation, and less resistance to infection, where Vitamin A levels were less than
optimum.
Lack of Vitamin A in the diet of pigs resulted in ‘extreme in coordination and spasms’,
and a tendency to abortion and farrowing dead piglets. Another researcher quoted by Price showed that lack of
Vitamin A produced disturbances in ‘oestrus and ovulation’, leading to sterility.
Professor Hale of the Texas Agricultural Experimental Station found that as well as
piglets being born blind, “depriving pigs of Vitamin A for a sufficient period produced severe nerve involvements,
including paralysis and spasms so the animals could not rise to their feet” (Would this be relevant to cerebral
palsy in the human infant?)
Professor Hale also found that if the sire of any species were deprived of Vitamin A,
he would become sterile. Disturbances of the development of the upper and lower jaw and tooth decay were also
reported in humans whose diets lacked Vitamin A. Further information can be found at:
www.pricepottenger.org/Articles/NoEyes.html
www.westonaprice.org/vitmins/vitaminsaga.html
In the 24years of running Foresight we have not seen any of the deformities listed above
in ‘our’ babies. I would not therefore be tempted to supplement above 5,000iu (1,501mcg), although you could
probably take up to 10,000iu (3,303mcg~) without harm.
However, I think there could be case made out for a little more with the multiple births,
especially triplets.
I would also not be confused or bullied into taking less than 2,500iu (750mcg) as this
could lead to the risk of serious malformations. 45,000 babies (1 baby in 16) are now born in Britain with
malformations annually. The largest groups include those with malformations listed above which are proven by
scientific research to be due to Vitamin A deficiency. This is a tragedy probably greater than the thalidomide
debacle, and it should be more easily preventable, as all the research is out there, and has been for many years.
At the present time, The Department of Health (DoH), say they “have no position on
Vitamin A in pregnancy”. They passed me on to the Food Standards Agency who passed me back to the DoH. On the
second contact, we have had an exchange of correspondence that you will find on our website.
We continue to advise you to take 2,500iu (750mcg) and 4,232iu (1,270mcg) daily, before
and throughout pregnancy.
You are welcome to take this information to your GP, midwife or health visitor if this would be helpful.
If they (or you) have any scientific papers that contradicts what I am saying, or supports it, I would be particularly grateful to
be sent a copy, as I would be very interested to study them.
- References
- The Denner Report, London, HMSO (c1990)
- Werbach., M., “Nutritional Influences on Illness”, Third Line Press, California, USA(1988)
- Naish, F., and Roberts, J., “Better Babies”, Random House, Australia, P57., (1966)
- Jennings, I.W.., “Vitamins in Endocrine Metabolism”
- William Heinemann Medical Press, pp130-131 (1972)
- Price, W.A., “Nutritional and Physical Degeneration”
- The Price Pottinger Nutrition Foundation, LA Mesa, California, USA (1945)
- Hale, F., “Pigs Born Without Eyeballs”, J Herad 24, pp 105-106 (1935)
« Back to supplements list